Back to Criminal Procedure Code 2010

Section history

Section 388 — Non-appearance of respondent

As in force on 31 December 2021.

Timeline 3 versions
  1. 2 January 2011 Enacted
  2. 31 December 2021 Revised edition
  3. 17 August 2026 Latest
Revised edition in force 31 December 2021

The text below is this provision as reproduced in the Revised Edition that came into force on this date. A revised edition consolidates the law without changing its substance, so editorial amendments — such as renumbering, updated citations and formatting — may have been made but are not shown as a redline.

388.Non-appearance of respondent

(1)If, at the hearing of the appeal, the respondent is absent and the appellate court is not satisfied that the notice under section 385 has been duly served on the respondent, the court must not make any order adverse to or to the prejudice of the respondent, but must adjourn the hearing to a future day and direct the Registrar of the Supreme Court to serve the notice on the respondent for the respondent to appear.

(2)If the notice cannot be served on the respondent, or if the court is satisfied that the notice has been duly served on the respondent, and the respondent is absent at the hearing of the appeal, the court may hear the appeal in the respondent’s absence.